Let's Start with Rahul

I always loved to watch Dravid batting, but that’s not the reason for me to feel disappointed on dropping him again. The headline is “what was the selectors thoughts while picking him for the away series of Srilanka and S.Africa”, are they looking for a 23 ball 50 from him. We all know Dravid well and I hope the selectors also do. Dropping a man who did his job perfectly is definitely a shame. Is he dropped because of the result of Champions Trophy and then do we get the solution by dropping him. It was a team’s failure,not of any individual which includes the selector’s also. Or is age the problem, then why he been selected back and dropped after performing. If age is not an issue for the selector’s and politicians from doing their job then why it becomes a concern when it comes to players. Even then Dravid had been one among the rare players to stay away from injuries. I believe Dravid was the second best Indian batsman on both the series, but that’s been the problem for Dravid. Always treated as Second-Best. Even after having a completely different style and approach to the game, Dravid was always been compared with Sachin.

The approach of promoting youngsters is also going on a wrong direction, if you have to replace any player then play better than him. There is no charity business in sports. You better earn it to keep it. We are on the modern cricket world, here commitment and determination are treated as second-best qualities. No more time to stay in the crease and play, so walk out and hit back. Be a one-ball hero. People will forget cover-drive’s and square-cut’s easily, so its time to try some switch-hit’s and scoop’s.

We all respect you Mr. Wall, you are already a legend. So no need to prove anything else.

-Vishnu